Skip to main content

Now, the land of the demons

The Baspa river a tributary of the Sutlej hurtles down the Sangla valley in Himachal’s Kinnaur district, enveloped between the Great Himalayan and Dhauladhar mountain ranges. For centuries this has been a pristine place of outstanding natural beauty where mountain passes remain closed for six months of the year. It is a land of apricot, peach and apple orchards and lies on the ancient trade routes between India and Tibet. Legend has it that in this lush terrain lived the descendants of the ‘Kinners’, the demi-gods of the Hindu pantheon whose deeds have been immortalised in epics and in the writings of ancient Sanskrit poets. Sadly, over the last ten years this has all changed.

Jaiprakash Hydro-Power Limited owns and operates a 300 MW power project which has destroyed completely an entire region. Jaiprakash’s website claims that its hydro power is environmentally friendly and non-polluting. Nothing could be further from the truth. The project has in fact ruined the local ecology. Thousands of trees have been felled and the original course of the river altered. Land slides are frequent and a once spectacular region is left in devastation.

The project has more than once suffered the fury of the Baspa river. In June 2000, flash floods claimed hundred of lives and thousands of tonnes of equipment. Excessive rains in the river’s catchment zones, some of which are located across the border in Tibet, results in the creation of underground and surface lakes. Eventually the mountain caves in when water pressures become excessive and a massive flow takes place without a hint of advance warnings. In 2005 a wave measuring 40 feet swept through the valley destroying everything in its path. Nature has its ways of getting back and it’s only a matter of time that this will happen again, only this time with greater ferocity now that the traditional flow of the river’s waters have been dammed.

Jaiprakash intended to construct another project a few miles upstream but fortunately the collective resistance of local communities has, at least for now, put that on the back burner. Such projects should never be allowed happen. They only do so because of a corrupt political system and under the garb of development and employment creation. The fact is, very little local employment is created either during construction or the operation of such plants. Workers compromise mostly of migrants from economically deprived provinces and often from neighbouring countries who are prepared to risk their lives and live and work in the most unsuitable conditions.

It is important for banks and financiers to understand the consequences of their investment. Project sponsors go for funding under the blanket of setting up something environmentally friendly. For some odd reason hydro power is considered less damaging than coal and in some instances that may well be true. For instance mini hydro projects whilst not completely environmentally sound are certainly less damaging than major ones. The cost benefit equations could at a stretch justify their creation. But large scale hydro-power plants are rarely defensible if social and environmental costs are taken in to consideration. Lenders and investors who participate in such projects are in reality socially and environmentally most irresponsible.

The tragedy is such things will continue despite the resistance of local communities. There is a lot of money to be made – longer term consequences be damned. For the people of Kinnaur, the Baspa river will never be the same again and neither will a way of life that their forefathers have enjoyed for thousands of years. What once was truly a land of the Gods is now a place only fit for demons.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Uday: a federalist success story

At our 21 st Annual CEO Roundtable in Thimphu last week, there was spirited debate over the performance of the current administration. A participant suggested that the Ujjwal Discom Assurance Yojana (Uday), a scheme to reform India’s downstream power sector, for all its fanfare was actually a failure of sorts and that India’s renewable energy programme, specifically on solar energy, was lacking on many counts. Whilst it was my intuitive belief that both claims were unsympathetic, I thought it would perhaps be in order to examine the facts in detail and subsequently provide an assessment. This paper, accordingly, presents an analysis of the first of the two issues – the Uday programme. The second will be addressed in a subsequent piece. The electricity distribution crisis: background Electricity distribution has been disastrously managed over the last three decades and in 2015 was on the verge of absolute collapse. Under-priced power, operational inefficiency, broken equip

The Employment Conundrum

Over the last three months, I have had the opportunity of engaging with our clients across various forums and cities. What provided a platform for this interaction was my briefing on four critical initiatives that we believe will, if properly implemented, serve as game changers with a palpable impact on economic output. The question that consistently came up almost everywhere was on the perception of jobless growth and consequently, rising unemployment within India. This has possibly been based on recent press reports and television debates that consistently cite certain headline statistics. These suggest a fall in employment levels between 2011-12 and 2015-16 compared to vigorous growth in earlier years, since 2004-05. Even on the surface, this conclusion does not gel fittingly with other statistics. For instance, indirect tax collections and consumption expenditure, which are both proxies of aggregate spending and wellbeing, do not corroborate falling employment. Tax collections

Farm Loan Waivers

Farming damage In 2008, when the Government of India announced a Rs 60,000 crore farm loan waiver, the decision horrified economists and the financial markets. The waiver, amounting to 1.3% of GDP, would cripple national finances and damage the credit culture. The moral hazard of penalising prudent borrowers would be systemic and enduring. However, its proponents argued that it would free farmers ‘from the suffocating clutches of endemic debt’ and, in the process, also provide a quick consumption stimulus to the economy. Subsequent events proved both assumptions awry and the folly of the decision was absorbed in a hard and painful way. Nevertheless, a lesson was learnt and federal Governments have since avoided a repeat. However, it would seem that it is now the turn of state Governments to blunder. In the last few months, Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, Karnataka and Punjab announced waivers of agricultural loans in their states to the tune of Rs 80,000 crore. Fortunately, the