Skip to main content

Japan - Impact on India

A number of clients wrote to me seeking our views on the fallout of the tragic events that occurred in Japan. My first impressions are that their impact on India are likely to border on the marginal.

Over the course of the past few days, the Bank of Japan pumped USD 280 bn into the economy and simultaneously offered a bond issue amounting to Y15 tn (approx USD 180 bn). In the short term, the Yen is bound to rise against a basket of currencies as Japan recalls its investments overseas and creates a demand for its own currency. In the longer term however, the economic impact of the tragedy will involve several rounds of pump priming and greater levels of Government borrowing, all of which will contribute towards rising fiscal imbalances. It is logical therefore, that the Yen will fall in value and this would much be as much a strategic imperative to bolster the competitiveness of the domestic economy as it would be an economic necessity.

In the short term, the recall of Yen investments will push up borrowing costs overseas and together with the reduced output from the Japanese economy, will knock off approximately 0.2% of global GDP.

As Japan begins the process of reconstruction, commodity prices should rise. Infrastructure will have to be created from scratch in vast areas of the north east. Hundreds upon thousands of homes would have to be rebuilt and therefore, it stands to logic that such an exercise will create the demand for basic metals. In the longer term, petroleum prices too will rise, as the possible closure of nuclear plants will need to be replaced by fossil fuels. It takes several years to complete the reconstruction of coal based generators and in the near term, Japan may have no choice but to use diesel power. Currently the oil markets witnessed a slight drop on account of the fact that Japan was forced to shut some refineries that were affected in the wake of the earthquake and tsunami.

Japanese investments overseas (including those in India) will take a hit. Over the next 2-3 years, the big Japanese kaishas will need to consolidate their businesses and are unlikely to make grand overseas investment plans. The Japanese Government has signed protocol agreements with Indian Ministries in several infrastructure projects, including the Delhi Mumbai freight corridor. In my view, these are likely to proceed, understandably with some delays, as the sums involved are not that substantial by Government standards and the projects themselves are long term in nature. Indo-Japanese trade is negligible – USD 10 bn – and is unlikely to have any material consequences for India’s economy. Clearly, some auto companies might have to struggle with their supply chains especially if they are dependent on Japan for imports of assemblies, components and auto steel. But these problems are unlikely to linger for too long.

The biggest fallout of the tragedy in Japan will be the reopening of debate within various constituencies in India on the viability of nuclear power. So far, the Government seems committed to pressing ahead with nuclear-based power stations but there is no question that opposition groups will now fight a lot harder, given the seriousness of the Japanese experience. India’s Environment Minister, Jairam Ramesh, has spoken up candidly on the necessity of re-examining the safety of existing plants. He may have done so with the tacit approval of the Party leadership. The National Advisory Council, chaired by Congress President Sonia Gandhi, comprises of a number of members who have inherently been uncomfortable with the use of nuclear technology. Therefore, in the very least, the debate will extend much longer. It is also likely that the Government will refocus its effort in the areas of renewable power and perhaps give greater thrust to the solar mission.

Finally, the Japanese tragedy should come as a wake up call to local authorities and provincial Governments on putting in place disaster management mechanisms. Frankly, India has none and a tragedy of this scale, should it God forbid ever take place, would be much more than catastrophic in nature. Hopefully under pressure from civil society and non Government organisations, some initiatives in this direction will begin.


Popular posts from this blog

Uday: a federalist success story

At our 21 st Annual CEO Roundtable in Thimphu last week, there was spirited debate over the performance of the current administration. A participant suggested that the Ujjwal Discom Assurance Yojana (Uday), a scheme to reform India’s downstream power sector, for all its fanfare was actually a failure of sorts and that India’s renewable energy programme, specifically on solar energy, was lacking on many counts. Whilst it was my intuitive belief that both claims were unsympathetic, I thought it would perhaps be in order to examine the facts in detail and subsequently provide an assessment. This paper, accordingly, presents an analysis of the first of the two issues – the Uday programme. The second will be addressed in a subsequent piece. The electricity distribution crisis: background Electricity distribution has been disastrously managed over the last three decades and in 2015 was on the verge of absolute collapse. Under-priced power, operational inefficiency, broken equip

Farm Loan Waivers

Farming damage In 2008, when the Government of India announced a Rs 60,000 crore farm loan waiver, the decision horrified economists and the financial markets. The waiver, amounting to 1.3% of GDP, would cripple national finances and damage the credit culture. The moral hazard of penalising prudent borrowers would be systemic and enduring. However, its proponents argued that it would free farmers ‘from the suffocating clutches of endemic debt’ and, in the process, also provide a quick consumption stimulus to the economy. Subsequent events proved both assumptions awry and the folly of the decision was absorbed in a hard and painful way. Nevertheless, a lesson was learnt and federal Governments have since avoided a repeat. However, it would seem that it is now the turn of state Governments to blunder. In the last few months, Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, Karnataka and Punjab announced waivers of agricultural loans in their states to the tune of Rs 80,000 crore. Fortunately, the

The Employment Conundrum

Over the last three months, I have had the opportunity of engaging with our clients across various forums and cities. What provided a platform for this interaction was my briefing on four critical initiatives that we believe will, if properly implemented, serve as game changers with a palpable impact on economic output. The question that consistently came up almost everywhere was on the perception of jobless growth and consequently, rising unemployment within India. This has possibly been based on recent press reports and television debates that consistently cite certain headline statistics. These suggest a fall in employment levels between 2011-12 and 2015-16 compared to vigorous growth in earlier years, since 2004-05. Even on the surface, this conclusion does not gel fittingly with other statistics. For instance, indirect tax collections and consumption expenditure, which are both proxies of aggregate spending and wellbeing, do not corroborate falling employment. Tax collections