Skip to main content

Who will be King?

Kishen Mehta gazes across the glass walls of his Nariman Point offices, as he mulls over the future of the business that he painstakingly built. Three decades ago Mr Mehta moved from his native Udaipur to Bombay. Now, past 65 years in age, he is keen to retire and hand the baton to a successor who would take his precious company into another league. He cannot decide which of his two sons should inherit his legacy. His wife’s persuasions notwithstanding, he is not even sure that either of them is really capable. Now that his company has gone public, he feels morally indebted to other shareholders and is compelled to detach paternal instincts from business obligations. He regrets the fact that over the years he paid no attention to the ‘what after Kishen’ issue.

Succession planning is a challenge in any business but in family owned ones, things occasionally get messy. The separation of ownership and management is hard to achieve in practice especially when those affected have been brought up to believe that they are inseparable. In a family business, the patriarch of the family is frequently also the head of the business. He therefore needs to balance the logical needs of business interests with more emotive family considerations. When it is hard to make a decision the over-powering temptation is to delay things, perhaps endlessly. Many family owned businesses, have done just that, with appalling consequences. A structured succession planning process is the only way to preserve the interest of the business and hopefully sanity within the family. Ideally this process should be outsourced, for instance, to a special committee of independent directors within the company’s board. This way the patriarch steps aside and cannot be accused of biases.

Many have argued that the system of handing a business from father to son is unfair as there may be others better qualified to take on the mantle more effectively. Whilst that may sometimes be true, the fact remains that ownership and control cannot fully be separated and clearly so in closely held companies or those where family holdings comprise a major portion of the share capital. In publically listed ones where ownership is widespread, independent directors or nominees of major shareholder groups, now more than before, speak their mind on succession issues. But the fact remains that a family member may be just as capable (and is frequently highly so) as a professional hired from outside. In the least his loyalties will always remain with the business and with its longer term interests. Selection committees should recognise this fact and lend it their due consideration.

For a while it had become foolishly fashionable to frown upon businesses that inducted family members in important positions within the business. On the contrary younger individuals from business families frequently have the best education and training in some of the world’s finest universities. Their exposure to the business commences at an early stage and as they mature they logically emerge as ideal candidates to assume leadership positions. There are several examples amongst Indian business families where successive generations have enlarged the business many times over when offered the opportunity to lead it. Be that as it may, the fact remains that the process of succession should be assigned to an independent committee and the planning process should begin early to ensure that the transition is smooth and effective. For Mr Mehta, retirement will have to wait for a few years until this is all over.


Popular posts from this blog

Uday: a federalist success story

At our 21 st Annual CEO Roundtable in Thimphu last week, there was spirited debate over the performance of the current administration. A participant suggested that the Ujjwal Discom Assurance Yojana (Uday), a scheme to reform India’s downstream power sector, for all its fanfare was actually a failure of sorts and that India’s renewable energy programme, specifically on solar energy, was lacking on many counts. Whilst it was my intuitive belief that both claims were unsympathetic, I thought it would perhaps be in order to examine the facts in detail and subsequently provide an assessment. This paper, accordingly, presents an analysis of the first of the two issues – the Uday programme. The second will be addressed in a subsequent piece. The electricity distribution crisis: background Electricity distribution has been disastrously managed over the last three decades and in 2015 was on the verge of absolute collapse. Under-priced power, operational inefficiency, broken equip

Farm Loan Waivers

Farming damage In 2008, when the Government of India announced a Rs 60,000 crore farm loan waiver, the decision horrified economists and the financial markets. The waiver, amounting to 1.3% of GDP, would cripple national finances and damage the credit culture. The moral hazard of penalising prudent borrowers would be systemic and enduring. However, its proponents argued that it would free farmers ‘from the suffocating clutches of endemic debt’ and, in the process, also provide a quick consumption stimulus to the economy. Subsequent events proved both assumptions awry and the folly of the decision was absorbed in a hard and painful way. Nevertheless, a lesson was learnt and federal Governments have since avoided a repeat. However, it would seem that it is now the turn of state Governments to blunder. In the last few months, Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, Karnataka and Punjab announced waivers of agricultural loans in their states to the tune of Rs 80,000 crore. Fortunately, the

The Employment Conundrum

Over the last three months, I have had the opportunity of engaging with our clients across various forums and cities. What provided a platform for this interaction was my briefing on four critical initiatives that we believe will, if properly implemented, serve as game changers with a palpable impact on economic output. The question that consistently came up almost everywhere was on the perception of jobless growth and consequently, rising unemployment within India. This has possibly been based on recent press reports and television debates that consistently cite certain headline statistics. These suggest a fall in employment levels between 2011-12 and 2015-16 compared to vigorous growth in earlier years, since 2004-05. Even on the surface, this conclusion does not gel fittingly with other statistics. For instance, indirect tax collections and consumption expenditure, which are both proxies of aggregate spending and wellbeing, do not corroborate falling employment. Tax collections