Skip to main content

China's Pointless Assertiveness

China’s decision to discard previous notions of neutrality between India and Pakistan and align both foreign policy and strategic outlook with Islamabad seems inconsistent considering its desire to play on the global stage as an emerging super power. Perhaps China is miffed at the tepid response offered by the Indian government on its Belt and Road Initiative. Ostensibly, it is irked by India’s unexpected standoff against the construction of a road in Doklam, a tri-junction nestled between the Indian State of Sikkim, Bhutan and Tibet. Bhutan, an Indian ally, considers the Doklam plateau a part of its sovereign territory and asserts that China’s claims on land in that area violate the status quo.
The foreign policy of nation states is crafted along strategic imperatives and understandably China’s should be no different. As the world’s second largest economy and the largest trading nation, China now wishes to define a new global order on trade, military and other interests. With the United States soft peddling on international affairs, following the Trump Administration’s America First policy, China seek to fill this vacuum. It has funded infrastructure development in Asian and African countries, set up military bases offshore in Africa and in the South China Sea, and sought to acquire respect through its military might and financial clout.
President Xi Jinping spoke of the ‘Great Rise of the Chinese Nation’ and quite sensibly believes that China’s time has come to reclaim past glories. Its Belt and Road initiative, like other prongs of State policy, provides the platform through which China will engage with other nations. But logically this engagement should be such that it benefits China either immediately or in the longer term. Its recent tilt against India on a number of issues, particularly ones that have to do with its troublesome neighbour Pakistan, seems puzzling. Pakistan is neither an alluring market nor stable enough to become a sustainable allay. India, on the other hand, remains a large, albeit sometimes difficult, opportunity that promises to emerge as a USD 6 trillion economy in a little over a decade. It will therefore create in the coming years, new markets for goods and services of a size comparable to what China itself had done a decade ago. Even today, China’s trade with India exceeds USD 70 billion with the balance grossly in China’s favour. Small tracts of barren land in the high Himalayas frankly cannot be appealing enough to sacrifice what is generally believed to constitute the next wave of global growth. With its technological edge and funding capability China could play a huge role in India’s development and profit commercially through acquiring market access in that process. What it has instead managed to do though is alienate public opinion and consequently make it tougher for policy makers to cut deals.
Perhaps it simply wishes to emerge as the sole and undisputed power in Asia brushing India, which justifiably has its own aspirations, out of the way. Pakistan, with all its disgusting ailments, provides a useful prop towards this process. But this strategy comes with consequences. India may be tempted to tilt even closer to America and Japan and, much to China’s dismay, create a naval axis within the Indian Ocean. In the longer term with military assertiveness, nobody stands to gain and China undoubtedly has something to lose. A conflict, or even sustained border skirmishes, will emasculate its global position as a responsible power, forcing countries against which it has territorial wrangles to take notice and treat it with suspicion. It may even dent its moral authority within global institutions and damage the very fabric of the world order that it is trying so hard to create. This assertiveness seems pointless. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

All the Prime Minister's Men

The composition of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s cabinet would suggest a desire to resume the process of reforms, which had practically stalled during his somewhat uninspiring previous term. It is also indicative of a more assertive Congress Party within the larger coalition of the United Progressive Alliance. The Congress has retained key economic ministries and also taken control of other important ones that were previously with their allies. With Pranab Mukherjee at the Treasury, P Chidambaram at Home and AK Antony at Defence, three crucial departments appear to be in the most capable hands.

Mr Mukherjee, possibly the senior most member of the Singh administration, has over the years served in various positions in the government. He was India’s Finance Minister between 1982 and 1984 in the Indira Gandhi cabinet and brings to the table considerable technical competence and robust political acumen. Disinvestment of state-owned enterprises; financial sector reform; the implementati…

The Employment Conundrum

Over the last three months, I have had the opportunity of engaging with our clients across various forums and cities. What provided a platform for this interaction was my briefing on four critical initiatives that we believe will, if properly implemented, serve as game changers with a palpable impact on economic output. The question that consistently came up almost everywhere was on the perception of jobless growth and consequently, rising unemployment within India. This has possibly been based on recent press reports and television debates that consistently cite certain headline statistics. These suggest a fall in employment levels between 2011-12 and 2015-16 compared to vigorous growth in earlier years, since 2004-05. Even on the surface, this conclusion does not gel fittingly with other statistics. For instance, indirect tax collections and consumption expenditure, which are both proxies of aggregate spending and wellbeing, do not corroborate falling employment. Tax collections ha…

Uday: a federalist success story

At our 21st Annual CEO Roundtable in Thimphu last week, there was spirited debate over the performance of the current administration. A participant suggested that the Ujjwal Discom Assurance Yojana (Uday), a scheme to reform India’s downstream power sector, for all its fanfare was actually a failure of sorts and that India’s renewable energy programme, specifically on solar energy, was lacking on many counts. Whilst it was my intuitive belief that both claims were unsympathetic, I thought it would perhaps be in order to examine the facts in detail and subsequently provide an assessment. This paper, accordingly, presents an analysis of the first of the two issues – the Uday programme. The second will be addressed in a subsequent piece.
The electricity distribution crisis: background
Electricity distribution has been disastrously managed over the last three decades and in 2015 was on the verge of absolute collapse. Under-priced power, operational inefficiency, broken equipment, rampant th…